Alex Bainbridge's Musings on travel ecommerce blog
Musings on travel ecommerce blog
Blog home  Blog home

Is UK trademark law more similar to US or French trademark law?

Friday, May 23rd, 2008

….. I guess we are about to find out.

Here is an interesting article about an event that took place in 2003 (ages ago!) in France….

“The Lower Court of Nanterre required Google France to pay 70,000 euros (about $81,400) to two companies that owned the rights to certain words. Google France sold the use of these words to advertisers through its AdWords program. AdWords permits individuals and companies to place advertisements on the Google home page that appear when a specific search term is used.

Travel agencies Luteciel and Viaticum sued Google in December 2002, after the search company refused to curb the use of disputed words in the AdWords program.

Luteciel and Viaticum claimed intellectual property rights in “bourse des vols” and “bourse des voyages,” which roughly translate to travel market and airflight market.

The French court concluded that Google France violated the country’s intellectual property code that, translated, “prohibits, in the absence of authorization of its owner, the use of a trademark for products or services identical to those indicated in the recording.” 

Funny how it is always travel companies who resort to the lawyers!

Lire l’article (en Anglais) 

If you are still hungry for more “legal stuff”…. (yeah I should rename this blog) then here is a very good backgrounder. It describes the differences between US and French law on trademark bidding on search engines.

http://www.lctjournal.washington.edu/Vol2/a014Keenan.html

“Recent judicial decisions in the United States and France seem to indicate that the jurisdictions are headed in opposite directions.

French courts appear to be taking a strong pro-trademark-owner stance, while American courts are showing more deference to search engines. This divergence reflects a fundamental difference in how trademarks are perceived under French law and American law: Trademark rights are more akin to property rights in France than in the United States. French trademark law focuses on a trademark owner’s investment of intellectual and financial resources in her trademark.

As a result, French law emphasizes protection of the trademark owner’s reputation and goodwill that become the “protectible features of the trademark” over time. American law and public policy, on the other hand, tend to favor consumer welfare and freedom of competition. Each is accorded great weight when courts consider the rights of trademark owners”

Perhaps Google were in “US mindset” when they changed their stance on trademark PPC bidding in the UK.


If you want to be notified next time something is published sign up for email alerts or subscribe to the RSS feed. Thank you for reading!





More posts (maybe related, maybe not)


2 Responses to “Is UK trademark law more similar to US or French trademark law?”


  1. May 23rd, 2008 at 1:56 pm
    Kevin May

    we have the latest twist here

     

  2. May 23rd, 2008 at 3:39 pm
    Claude

    Happy to be in France




This blog is about travel ecommerce with a focus on topics of interest to tour operators & travel companies

Alex has previously started up a small tour operator (5 staff) and also worked for leading "dot coms", airlines, hotel chains and tour operators advising and project managing web, ecommerce and reservation system projects.

Alex is available for travel ecommerce consulting via Travel UCD. Travel UCD also operates TourCMS - a web based reservation system for small tour operators


RSS Feed

Subscribe via daily email



AddThis Feed Button

Homepage
About this blog
Best of the blog (top 10 posts!)

Recent comments
Tamara: It’s a lot of money! But I guess it’s probably good value for the column inches it generates - of course as long as you get to the top five! To guarantee that it looks like you have to have...

Alex Bainbridge: Hi Tamara …. as for PhoCusWright….. I am sure that at the point the judges judged they were impartial - however it was a fairly self selecting group who put themselves forward to be judged...

Darren Cronian: Alex, I am worried that we are becoming on the same wave length. http://www.traveldotnet.co.uk/ articles/lets-not-forget-offli ne-travel-innovation/ No, I have just read this post now, I didn’t...

Pete Meyers: Alex - I’m really looking forward to hearing the pirate story, well done!

Ben Colclough: I must say I had more fun acting out a chicken in a restaurant in Yunnan, China than I would have had with the flip book. Seriously though - it is a good idea & innovative. Not sure I would want to...

Alex Bainbridge: Hi Pete The times I would have found this useful (PocketComms) I really wouldn’t have wanted to put an iphone into someone elses hands! For example negotiating with a people smuggling ship in...

Pete Meyers: I think the best innovation is a combination of great ideas and succinct execution. To your example about the PocketComms, it was a good idea that fermented for a number of years, yet who’s to say...

Tamara: This is an interesting debate. I wonder what the PhocusWright judges views are. They seemed to be very clear however that they wanted to reward companies who had actually created something - rather than simply...

Ben Colclough: P&G, generally regarded as a very innovative large consumer branded company has an approach to innovation that throws some light on this. They embrace failure as a necessary part of innovation. This...

Categories
Top commentators
Kevin May
Darren Cronian
Jeremy Head
John
Ben Colclough
Alex Bainbridge
graham steele
Ian McKee
Big Travel Web
Tamara
Guillaume
Ignacio
Neil MacLean
Dominic
John Pyle

Other travel & tourism blogs
Travolution
The Boot
Hotel Blogs
Travel Rants
TraveBlather
Travel PR Blog
Dot Tourism
Albert Barra [Spanish]

Wiwih blogs - a directory of travel industry blogs

Small Fish Big Ocean

Come and join my travel business social network! for small tour operators and niche agents


TourCMS