Alex Bainbridge's Musings on travel ecommerce blog
Musings on travel ecommerce blog
Blog home  Blog home

Transaction based pricing for reservation systems - why?

Wednesday, August 13th, 2008

Traveltek, a Glasgow (UK) based travel technology company, have, according to an article in the Travel Trade Gazette, reduced their growth forecasts for this calendar year, citing slower improvement in transactional revenues.

Well - this blog isn’t very hot for covering financial news - so I am not going to start now - but what I am interested in is how influenced Traveltek is by the booking value going through their software.

We are still significantly up on last year…… but we have rolled out a huge number of new clients, so pro-rata we have to worry about the volumes that those clients are doing” [Source: TTG: Kenny Picken, Managing Director]

One standard way for charging for reservation systems for travel companies is to break the fees down to the following:

  • Software license (maybe based on number of “seats” or staff users - either total or concurrent)
  • Annual support (a percentage of the software license fee)
  • Project costs (a “per day” professional services fee)
  • Transaction costs (a few GBP pounds or USD) per booking put in the system

The point I am making is that I believe that software providers should not be charging transaction based pricing UNLESS they are also providing the hardware and data centre systems.

From a travel companies perspective, if your supplier is charging transaction based pricing this can have the following impacts:

  • You may be tempted to take bookings for low value products in a system away from your primary reservation system (because the transaction system fee becomes too large a proportion on small value sales)
  • Some companies, especially tailor made tour operators, like to present a couple of alternative itineraries to a client. Each alternative quote could incur a transaction fee (depending upon whether the reservation system supplier charges on confirmed bookings or just bookings in the system)

Most importantly though, a reservation system supplier may not enhance the non-transactional side of their software as they have no commercial incentive to do so. For example, CRM or CMS functionality may not see as much development investment as the travel technology company can’t see a direct return on transactional value.

However, a travel technology company could use transaction based pricing if they are also providing the hosting and data centre as part of the overall technology package. This assumes that the “load” put on the system is directly correlated to the number of bookings going through the system. In this situation though the transaction fee should still be a fixed fee (rather than percentage) as the load placed on the system is similar between a low value transaction and a high sale price tailor made tour to 5* hotels.

Final thought….. just think of all the Hollywood blockbusters that have been written using Microsoft Word. I am not sure script writers receive, through the post, bills and invoices for percentage fees for using their software. Software is just that and should not be charged for use.


If you want to be notified next time something is published sign up for email alerts or subscribe to the RSS feed. Thank you for reading!





More posts (maybe related, maybe not)


4 Responses to “Transaction based pricing for reservation systems - why?”


  1. August 13th, 2008 at 10:03 am
    Kenny Picken

    Actually, we do host all our products, especially the transactional aspects and therefore we are very much concerned that traffic v actual revenue meets with expectations.

    We also adopt all the other aforementioned invoicing models, where appropriate.

    The TTG article was at their request merely highlighting the slow down in business across the board.(Traveltek’s order books are doing very well but actual transactions have disappointed us, which is not uncommon in mature res systems across the UK)

    We are still up very substantially year on year but not where we expected.

    Not really sure why this article was of any particular interest to you but there you go. More of the same. Always good for our SEO profile, so thanks for that!

  2. August 13th, 2008 at 10:15 am
    Alex Bainbridge

    Hi Kenny,
    Thanks for your comment. Yes - I wasn’t writing about your own system specifically - just the TTG article prompted me to write about it - hence I mentioned Traveltek as an example.

    I was thinking of writing that you mentioned that your sales team were “optimistic”. Never met an unoptimistic one (that get to keep their jobs!)

    Glad I can help your SEO !

    Best wishes. Alex

  3. August 13th, 2008 at 4:37 pm
    Mathew Currie

    Another pricing model to be extremely cautious of is “Pay per search”.

    For example: “You are allowed 500 searches for each booking you make. If your average searches per booking exceed this then we’ll charge you 0.0x pence per additional search”

    In these days of meta-search / price comparison / consolidator sites the “search-to-book” ratio you agreed to three years ago can get used up very, very quickly leaving you with a stark decision to renegotiate your hosting contracts from a position of weakness or turn away potential business (and probably a first month usage bill to make your jaw drop!)

    The advent of meta-meta-search could mean that a customer request will trigger a cascade of multiple search requests that are all after exactly the same data (with each consolidator adding their own mark-up / discount). The poor back-end systems are going to take even more of a hammering.

    Before agreeing to distribute your stock through a consolidator or signing up to a search through a consolidator think very carefully about where these limits are and how far away you might be from them. (And Cache results wherever you can!)

    Search-to-book ratios of many thousands to one are now not uncommon in the industry.

    Here’s an article about Meta-meta - perhaps it won’t take off…..
    http://www.travolution.co.uk/Articles/2008/08/12/1623/’Meta-meta’+site+hit+by+partner+concerns.html

  4. August 14th, 2008 at 3:32 am
    Kenny Picken

    hi Alex. quite right about the sales team. Life would be disappointing if they were not optimistic indeed. However, what I meant was that they are oin line to break the targets set at the beginning of the year and given all the scare of this “credit crunch” we have not yet exerienced any downturn in actual system sales and the optimism comes from our pipleine of potential sales which would appear to suggest that we will exceed those aggressive sales targets this year, which of course would be fantastic.

    Traveltek has several revenue streams supporting our business (thankfully) and system sales is but one, albeit a very important one. Therefore, to see our system sales so bouyant, it does breed optimism within the business and of course keeps the products themselves evolving with investments in new features, especially in CRM, user generated content and all that good stuff.

    and of course, another post for our SEO!

Leave a Reply


Comments for this post will be closed on 11 December 2008.




This blog is about travel ecommerce with a focus on topics of interest to tour operators & travel companies

Alex has previously started up a small tour operator (5 staff) and also worked for leading "dot coms", airlines, hotel chains and tour operators advising and project managing web, ecommerce and reservation system projects.

Alex is available for travel ecommerce consulting via Travel UCD. Travel UCD also operates TourCMS - a web based reservation system for small tour operators


RSS Feed

Subscribe via daily email



AddThis Feed Button

Homepage
About this blog
Best of the blog (top 10 posts!)

Recent comments
Alex Bainbridge: Hi Tamara …. as for PhoCusWright….. I am sure that at the point the judges judged they were impartial - however it was a fairly self selecting group who put themselves forward to be judged...

Darren Cronian: Alex, I am worried that we are becoming on the same wave length. http://www.traveldotnet.co.uk/ articles/lets-not-forget-offli ne-travel-innovation/ No, I have just read this post now, I didn’t...

Pete Meyers: Alex - I’m really looking forward to hearing the pirate story, well done!

Ben Colclough: I must say I had more fun acting out a chicken in a restaurant in Yunnan, China than I would have had with the flip book. Seriously though - it is a good idea & innovative. Not sure I would want to...

Alex Bainbridge: Hi Pete The times I would have found this useful (PocketComms) I really wouldn’t have wanted to put an iphone into someone elses hands! For example negotiating with a people smuggling ship in...

Pete Meyers: I think the best innovation is a combination of great ideas and succinct execution. To your example about the PocketComms, it was a good idea that fermented for a number of years, yet who’s to say...

Tamara: This is an interesting debate. I wonder what the PhocusWright judges views are. They seemed to be very clear however that they wanted to reward companies who had actually created something - rather than simply...

Ben Colclough: P&G, generally regarded as a very innovative large consumer branded company has an approach to innovation that throws some light on this. They embrace failure as a necessary part of innovation. This...

Ben Colclough: I think defining innovation as it applies in business is impossible. I have worked with very succesful innovation agencies and spent large amounts of money (well someone else’s) to develop only a...

Categories
Top commentators
Kevin May
Darren Cronian
Jeremy Head
John
Ben Colclough
Alex Bainbridge
graham steele
Ian McKee
Big Travel Web
Guillaume
Ignacio
Neil MacLean
Dominic
John Pyle
Tamara

Other travel & tourism blogs
Travolution
The Boot
Hotel Blogs
Travel Rants
TraveBlather
Travel PR Blog
Dot Tourism
Albert Barra [Spanish]

Wiwih blogs - a directory of travel industry blogs

Small Fish Big Ocean

Come and join my travel business social network! for small tour operators and niche agents


TourCMS